Trichoderma viride Controls Macrophomina
phaseolina through
its DNA disintegration and Production of Antifungal Compounds
Iqra Haider Khan1, Arshad
Javaid1* and Dildar Ahmed2
1Institute of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab,
Quaid-i-Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan
2Department of Chemistry, Forman Christian College (A Chartered
University), Lahore, Pakistan
*For correspondence:
arshad.iags@pu.edu.pk; arshadjpk@yahoo.com
Received 16 October 2020;
Accepted 16 January 2021; Published 25 March 2021
Abstract
Macrophomina phaseolina is a
highly destructive pathogen of more than 500 plant species. It is difficult to
eradicate it through chemical means as no patented fungicide is available
against this pathogen. Biological control is the possible alternative method
for its suitable management. The present study was carried out to evaluate the
biocontrol potential of five Trichoderma spp. against M. phaseolina and
the possible mechanisms of action. Identifications of all the Trichoderma spp. viz. T.
hamatum, T. harzianum, T. koningii, T. longipile and T. viride
were
confirmed on molecular basis by using two universal primer pairs namely ITS and
EF1. Their biocontrol potential was evaluated in dual culture plate method
where T. viride showed the highest inhibitory
efficacy (63%) against M. phaseolina. T. koningii,
T. hamatum and T. longipile showed akin effects by arresting growth of
the pathogen by 46–47% followed
by T. harzianum
(28%). To find out the mechanisms
of action, secondary extrolites of the best biocontrol
fungus T. viride were tested against the
pathogenic genomic DNA where all the concentrations partially degraded DNA
bands after 24 h of incubation and a complete DNA band disappearance was noted
after 48 h incubation. In addition, T. viride culture filtrates were partitioned with chloroform
and ethyl acetate and subjected to GC-MS analysis for identification of
potential antifungal constituents. The most abundant identified volatile
compounds in the two organic solvent fractions were 9,12-octadecadienoic acid
(Z,Z)- (44.54%), n-hexadecanoic acid (24.02%), hexadecanoic
acid, 2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester (14.25%), 9-tricosene, (Z)-
(10.43%) and [1,1'-bicyclopropyl]-2-octanoic acid, 2'-hexyl-, methyl ester
(10.43%). To conclude, T. viride was the best biocontrol agent against M. phaseolina and acts against the pathogen by DNA
disintegration and production of antifungal secondary metabolites. ©
2021 Friends Science Publishers
Keywords: Biocontrol; DNA
cleavage; GC-MS analysis; Macrophomina phaseolina; Secondary
extrolites; Trichoderma viride
Introduction
The fungus Macrophomina
phaseolina is a noxious pathogen that infects
more than 500 host plant species belonging to about 100 families globally (Schroeder et al. 2019). The pathogen has a wide geographical
distribution, and is commonly found in Europe, Africa, Asia, South and North
America (Zimudzi et al. 2017).
It causes stem rot, charcoal rot and root rot in major crops including cotton,
sorghum, maize, sunflower, soybean, sesame, jute, green gram and common bean
with severe yield losses (Khan et al. 2017;
Degani et al. 2020). The pathogen rapidly propagates under high
temperature and drought conditions (Muchero et
al. 2011). Due to its persistent
nature, it can remain viable in the form of microsclerotia as resistant
structures in soil or infected plant debris for up to 3 years (Short et al. 1980; Vasebi
et al. 2013). At initial stage of
infection, its hyphae invade the plant cortical tissues which turn into
grey-black sclerotia in infected areas (Chowdhury
et al. 2014). As the disease
progresses, the infected plant turns yellow and ultimately dies (Farnaz et al. 2018). As the pathogen is soil-borne and has a wide host range, it is very
difficult to manage it through traditional methods that have been largely based
on the use of agronomic and cultural practices (Khalili et al. 2016).
Chemical fungicides used to control fungal diseases are often applied in large
quantities with repeated use in agricultural production, which pose drastic
effects on the consumers and environment by toxins production (Chamorro et al. 2016). Therefore, high risk fungicides have increased
the awareness to eliminate the use of synthetic products and encouraged the
farmers to increase dependency on biocontrol agents for disease control (Zhang et al. 2018).
Biological control is a potential alternate
to the synthetic chemical fungicides. It is considered to be an eco-friendly
and low-cost strategy for the management of soil-borne pathogens (Muller-Scharer et al.
2020). To date, a number of
registered biocontrol agents are commercially available belonging to Trichoderma,
Candida, Gliocladium, Coniothyrium, Streptomyces, Bacillus,
Pseudomonas and Agrobacterium genera (Bayoumy et
al. 2017; Deng et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2018). Among them, the genus Trichoderma has a wide biotechnological interest and hence
comprising on mycoparasitic species, particularly T.
pseudokoningii, T. hamatum, T. harzianum,
T. koningii and T. viride
that have received a great attention in reducing the populations of soil-borne
pathogens including Sclerotium rolfsii,
Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium oxysporum
and M. phaseolina (Bastakoti et al. 2017). The antagonistic mechanism of Trichoderma species is a
combination of diverse mechanisms including direct confrontation with fungal
pathogens, competition for nutrients and the production of cell-wall degrading
enzymes (Anjum et al. 2019). So far, Trichoderma spp. are the most
studied biocontrol agents and are commercially marketed as biofertilizers,
biopesticides and for soil amendments (Kumar
et al. 2017). These serve as
important antibiotic, fast growing, strong spore producer, secondary
opportunistic invaders and a source of chitinases, glucanases
and cellulases cell wall degrading enzymes (Hewavitharana et al. 2018). Secondary
metabolites produced by Trichoderma spp. are antifungal strain dependent
substances belonging to different classes of volatile compounds (Pascale et al. 2017). The direct application of anti-microbial
compounds of antagonistic fungi instead of living organisms is more
advantageous in agriculture and industry because of their inability to
reproduce and spread (Soesanto et al. 2019). Therefore, the objective of the present study was to assess the
comparative antagonistic effect of five Trichoderma species against M.
phaseolina, and to investigate the antagonism mechanism as well as to
identify the secondary extrolites produced by T. viride.
Materials and Methods
Molecular characterization of selected isolates
Five Trichoderma species viz. T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. koningii, T. longipile and T. viride were procured from the First Culture Bank of Pakistan (FCBP). Genomic DNA of all the selected fungi were extracted by using CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1990). For molecular identification, the contiguous Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and elongation factor 1-alpha (EF1) regions were amplified with primer sets given in Table 1. ITS and EF1 amplicons were loaded to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel, purified and sequenced at the Molecular and Cellular Imaging Center (MCIC) of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH, USA on the Illumina MiSeq platform. The obtained sequences were subjected to BLAST analysis and deposited in NCBI.
In vitro antagonistic activity of Trichoderma species
Dual culture experiments were
conducted to determine the in vitro biocontrol potential of Trichoderma
spp. against M. phaseolina where both the species were inoculated on
peripheries of the same 90-mm diameter malt extract agar plates. Mycelial agar
plugs (5 mm in diameter) of each filamentous Trichoderma culture were
placed at opposite end of the tested pathogen (5 mm in diameter) for the
establishment of dual culture and a control was also prepared by placing M. phaseolina plugs only. Each treatment contained six
replicates and the plates were incubated at 28°C for 5 days. The experiment was
carried out in a completely randomized design. The antagonistic potential of
each Trichoderma species was assessed
by measuring the pathogen radial growth in the direction of Trichoderma isolates
and calculated by using the following formula (Rini and Sulochana 2008):
DNA degradation study
T. viride
secondary
metabolites were used to explore their potential antagonistic mechanism against
M. phaseolina in a DNA degradation experiment.
For the preparation of secondary metabolites, mycelial agar plugs (5 mm in
diameter) of T. viride were inoculated in malt
extract broth flasks which were agitated
for two weeks on an orbital shaker (150 rpm) at 30°C. Subsequently, the
broth was passed through two layers of filter paper and the resultant liquid
was kept in an electric oven at 40°C to concentrate it for the preparation of
higher concentrations viz. 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500%. Next, 5 µL
of each concentration were mixed in equal volume of M. phaseolina
DNA in separate vials and incubated at 37°C for 24 and 48 h. A control was
also set for comparison. Thereafter, all the treatments were loaded on 1%
agarose gel and run for 45 min at 100 volts to examine the extent of DNA
degradation (Katrahalli et al. 2019).
GC-MS analysis
Mycelial discs were taken
from the margins of an actively growing culture of T. viride and inoculated in 100 mL autoclaved malt
extract broth in Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL) under aseptic conditions. Inoculated flasks were agitated
on an orbital shaker Table 1: List of oligonucleotide primers used for the characterization
of T. viride at molecular level
Primer name |
5´ to 3´ sequence |
Annealing
temperature |
ITS 1 Forward |
TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG |
60°C |
ITS 4 Reverse |
TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC |
|
EF1-728 Forward |
CATCGAGAAGTTCGAGAAGG |
60°C |
EF1-986 Reverse |
TACTTGAAGGAACCCTTACC |
Table
2: Trichoderma spp. with their respective
accession numbers and products amplicon size
Penicillium spp. |
ITS |
EF-1 |
||
Amplicon size
(bp) |
Accession
numbers |
Amplicon size
(bp) |
Accession
numbers |
|
T. hamatum |
~ 535 |
MT573507 |
~ 354 |
MN736405 |
T. harzianum |
~ 556 |
MN721820 |
~ 333 |
MN736406 |
T. koningii |
~ 538 |
MT573514 |
~ 363 |
MN736407 |
T. longipile |
~ 547 |
MT573512 |
~ 435 |
MN736408 |
T. viride |
~ 554 |
MT573511 |
~ 368 |
MN736410 |
Table 3: Compounds identified from
chloroform fraction of culture filtrates of T.
viride through GC-MS analysis
Names
of compounds |
Molecular formula |
Molecular weight |
Retention
time (min) |
Peak
area (%) |
n-Hexadecanoic
acid |
C16H32O2 |
256 |
7.067 |
24.02 |
9,12-Octadecadienoic
acid (Z,Z)- |
C18H32O2 |
280 |
7.809 |
44.54 |
[1,1'-Bicyclopropyl]-2-octanoic acid, 2'-hexyl-,methyl
ester |
C21H38O2 |
322 |
9.197 |
10.43 |
Octadecanoic acid, 9,10-dihydroxy-, methyl ester |
C19H38O4 |
330 |
9.415 |
20.89 |
Table 4: Compounds identified from ethyl
acetate fraction of culture filtrate of T.
viride through GC-MS analysis
Names
of compounds |
Molecular formula |
Molecular weight |
Retention
time (min) |
Peak
area (%) |
Benzene, nitro- |
C6H5NO2 |
123 |
2.857 |
15.05 |
Naphthalene |
C10H8 |
128 |
3.395 |
4.99 |
n-Hexadecanoic
acid |
C16H32O2 |
256 |
7.073 |
6.55 |
1-Nonadecene |
C19H38 |
266 |
7.203 |
5.70 |
9,12-Octadecadienoic
acid (Z,Z)- |
C18H32O2 |
280 |
7.796 |
40.09 |
9-Tricosene, (Z)- |
C23H46 |
322 |
8.015 |
10.43 |
Cis-9-Hexadecenal |
C16H30O |
238 |
8.621 |
2.84 |
Hexadecanoic
acid,2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester |
C19H38O4 |
330 |
9.628 |
14.25 |
3-n-Butylthiophene-1,1-dioxide |
C8H12O2S |
172 |
10.544 |
4.20 |
(150 rpm) at 30°C for 15 days.
The broth was filtered through Whatman filter paper to remove mycelia. The
broth was then partitioned with chloroform followed by ethyl acetate in a glass
separating funnel. The obtained fractions were subjected to GC-MS analysis for
identification of compounds.
Analysis was done on
GC-2010 plus, Shimadzu attached with DB-5MS. The capillary column was 0.25 µm ×
0.25 mm × 30 m with temperature capacity of 350°C. A mass spectral library,
Version 2.70, Shimadzu Co., was used. Helium as a carrier gas was used in pure
form in accordance with split-less injection system (1.0 µL volume),
developed for operating the chromatograph with 1 cm3 min-1 spill
count at 250°C. The total sample running time was set for 11 min.
Statistical analysis
The dual culture experiment was
conducted in a completely randomized design with six replicates. For each
treatment, standard errors of the means were calculated. Data regarding percentage
inhibition in growth of M. phaseolina due to various Trichoderma spp. in dual culture plates were analyzed statistically
by applying one-way ANOVA followed by LSD test at P≤0.05, using computer
software Statistix 8.1.
Results
Molecular identification of antagonistic fungi
Fig. 1: Molecular characterization of Trichoderma species
A)- Genomic DNA of Trichoderma species. B)- ITS1/ITS4
amplified PCR product of Trichoderma species.
C)- EF1f/EF1r amplified PCR product of Trichoderma species
(M): 1 kb DNA standard marker,
(1): T. hamatum, (2): T. harzianum, (3): T. koningii,
(4): T. longipile, (5): T. viride
Fig. 2: Interaction of M. phaseolina with
Trichoderma species
A)- Pure culture of M. phaseolina
(MP); B)- MP co-culture with T. viride; C)- MP co-culture with T. hamatum; D)- MP co-culture with T. longipile; E)- MP co-culture with T. harzianum;
and F)- MP co-culture with T. koningii
Fig. 3: Inhibition in radial growth of M. phaseolina due
to interaction with different Trichoderma
species Vertical bars show standard errors of means of six replicates.
Values with different letters at their top show significant difference (P≤0.05) as determined by LSD test
In the present study, molecular
characterization of T. hamatum, T. harzianum,
T. koningii, T. longipile
and T. viride rDNA was carried out with ITS
and EF1 universally accepted primers (Fig. 1). The resultant PCR product
sequences were subjected to BLAST analysis where all the isolated strains
showed 99 to 100% similarities with the already submitted sequences and
deposited to Genebank for respective accession
numbers (Table 2).
Interactions of Trichoderma spp.
with M. phaseolina
Among the five tested Trichoderma spp., T. viride showed the best antagonistic
potential against M. phaseolina
by arresting its growth up to 64% over control. Rest of the Trichoderma species
were less effective than T. viride where
about akin reduction (46–47%) in the pathogen growth was observed due to
T. koningii,
T. hamatum and T. longipile.
T. harzianum showed the least suppressive ability and reduced growth of
the pathogen only by 28% (Fig. 2–3).
DNA degradation study
Interaction of M. phaseolina ribosomal DNA with secondary metabolites of T.
viride is illustrated in Fig. 4. All the
Fig. 4: Gel
electrophoresis showing effect of different concentrations of secondary
metabolites of T. viride
on cleavage of M. phaseolina
DNA samples incubated for 24 h (A) and 48 h (B)
(M): 1 kb DNA standard marker, (1): Genomic DNA of M.
phaseolina, (2): Negative control (genomic DNA of
M. phaseolina + malt
extract broth), (3): original or 100% metabolites,
(4): 200% metabolites, (5): 300% metabolites, (6): 400% metabolites,
and (7): 500% metabolites. Arrows indicate the
presence or absence of DNA
Fig. 5: GC-MS chromatograms of chloroform and ethyl
acetate fractions of culture filtrate of T. viride
concentrations except 500%
partially cleaved the pathogenic fungus DNA and form smears after 24 h of
incubation whereas the 500% concentration was found to be more effective than
lower concentrations and completely disintegrated DNA of the fungal pathogen.
After 48 h of incubation, it was noted that all the concentrations completely
damaged M. phaseolina DNA.
GC-MS analysis
The GC-MS chromatogram of T. viride
chloroform and ethyl acetate fractions showed the presence of 4 and 9 peaks
of volatile compounds, respectively (Fig. 5). The compounds in chloroform
fraction with their details of percent peak areas and retention time are
reported in Table 3. The compound present in the highest concentration was
9,12-octadecadienoic acid Table 5:
Potential antimicrobial constituents in chloroform and ethyl acetate fraction
of T. viride
Names
of compounds |
Property |
Reference |
9,12-Octadecadienoic
acid (Z,Z)- |
Antifugal, antibacterial, nematicidal, anti-coronary and anti-inflammatory |
Tahir et al. (2019); Arora and Kumar (2018); Prajapati et al. (2017) |
n-Hexadecanoic
acid |
Antifungal,
nematicide, pesticide and antioxidant |
Pavithra et al. (2018); Vats
and Gupta (2017); Elaiyaraja and Chandramohan (2016); Pohl et al. (2011) |
Hexadecanoic
acid,2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester |
Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant |
Al-Marzoqi et al. (2015); Pandey et al. (2014) |
9-Tricosene, (Z)- |
Pesticidal |
Verma et al. (2015) |
[1,1'-Bicyclopropyl]-2-octanoic
acid,2'-hexyl-,methyl ester |
Pesticide, anticancer and
antidiabetic |
Banakar
and Jayaraj (2017) |
1-Nonadecene |
Antifungal and Anticancer |
Premathilaka and
Silva (2016) |
Naphthalene |
Antioxidant and antibacterial |
Shareef et al. (2016) |
cis-9-Hexadecenal |
Antimicrobial |
Juliet et al. (2018); Arora and Meena (2017) |
(Z,Z)- (44.54%). The moderately
abundant compounds in this fraction were n-hexadecanoic acid (24.02%), octadecanoic acid,
9,10-dihydroxy-, methyl ester (20.89%) and [1,1'-bicyclopropyl]-2-octanoic
acid, 2'-hexyl-, methyl ester (10.43%).
Details of ethyl acetate fraction spectrum profile are given in Table 4.
Ethyl acetate fraction showed the highest abundunce of 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-
(40.09%) whereas, the compounds present in moderate concentrations were benzene,
nitro- (15.05%), hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxy- 1-(hydroxymethyl)
ethyl ester (14.25%) and 9-tricosene, (Z)- (10.43%). On the other hand, n-hexadecanoic
acid (6.55%), 1-nonadecene (5.70%), naphthalene (4.99%), 3-n-butylthiophene-1,1-dioxide (4.20%) and
cis-9-hexadecenal
(2.84%) were ranked as less abundant compounds.
Discussion
Accurate
identification of Trichoderma spp. is necessary to study their detailed
mechanism of antagonism and for the preparation of effective management
strategies against the soil-borne fungal pathogens (Mokhtari et al. 2017).
Genomic DNA sequence and amplification through universal set of primer pairs is
the most authentic tool for identification on molecular basis (Sawant et al. 2019). In the present investigation, Trichoderma
spp., especially T. viride, remarkably
inhibited the growth of M. phaseolina. Previously, Gaur (2016) worked on T. atroviride, T. viride and
T. harzianum under in vitro conditions
to assess their antagonistic potential towards the M. phaseolina
by direct co-culturing on Czapek’s dox medium
where all the isolates showed promising inhibitory effects on growth of the
pathogen. Similarly, a clear inhibition zone formation was observed against M.
phaseolina by T. viride
in dual culture assay performed by Piperkova et
al. (2016). Likewise, Mishra and Dantre (2017)
treated soybean seeds with secondary metabolite formulations of T. viride to manage the charcoal rot disease caused by M.
phaseolina under field conditions. Trichoderma spp. are known to have a
number of mechanisms through which these control the growth of pathogenic
fungi. Trichoderma spp. may control
the growth of pathogenic fungi through mycoparasitism (Mukhopadhyay and Kumar
2020). A complex system of various extracellular enzymes such as chitinase (Hoell et al.
2005), proteolytic enzymes (Pozo et al. 2004) and β-1,3- glucanolytic system (Kubicek et al.
2001), results in lysis of cell wall of the fungal pathogens (Verma et al. 2007). In addition, Trichoderma spp. also inhibit hyphal
growth of the fungal pathogens through antibiosis by producing antimicrobial
compounds in the culture (Gajera et al. 2020).
Considering the significant antifungal activity of T. viride in dual culture assay, its extrolites
were selected for evaluation of their effect on in vitro degradation of DNA of the pathogenic fungus. In this study,
secondary extrolites showed great potential in
degrading the genomic DNA after 48 h incubation. Earlier, this mechanism of
action of T. viride against fungal pathogens has not been reported. Instead,
generally this methodology was adopted to assess the antibacterial mechanism of
action of nanoparticles (Dong et al. 2017; Dashamiri et al. 2018;
Jadhav et al. 2018). A variety
of lytic enzymes and antifungal compounds are produced by T. viride, which might be responsible of
DNA degradation in the present study (Calistru
et al. 1997; Parizi
et al. 2012).
The GC-MS analysis showed many compounds from chloroform and ethyl
acetate fractions that were previously reported to have antimicrobial
properties. Among the major identified constituents, 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-
was previously isolated from the methanolic extract of Cenchrus biflorus
with
potent antibacterial, nematicidal and
fungicidal activities as given in Table 5 (Arora and Kumar 2018;
Tahir et al. 2019). Similarly, Pavithra
et al. (2018) worked on
bioactivity of n-hexadecanoic
acid (also known as palmitic acid) and reported that it possesses strong
pesticidal and antioxidant properties. This compound is known to exhibit
antifungal activity against a number of fungal species including Aspergillus
terreus, A. niger, A. nidulans (Emericella nidulans)
Alernaria solani,
Fusarium oxysporum and Cucumerinum
lagenarium (Pohl et al. 2011).
Likewise, hexadecanoic
acid,2-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) ethyl ester was isolated from the methanolic
extract of
Limonia acidissima and tested
against pathogenic bacterial strains. The compound showed excellent
antibacterial potential against S. aureus, S. epidermidis and
B. subtilis (Pandey et al.
2014). Verma et al. (2015) reported
pesticidal potential of 9-tricosene, (Z)- and [1,1'-bicyclopropyl]-2-octanoic acid, 2'-hexyl-,
methyl ester. Similarly, 1-nonadecene; naphthalene and cis-9-hexadecenal
are potent antifungal and antioxidant compounds (Premathilaka and Silva 2016;
Shareef et al. 2016; Juliet et al. 2018).
Conclusion
There was antagonistic potential
of T. viride against a highly problematic
fungal pathogen M. phaseolina. T. viride possibly
controlled the pathogen by degrading its DNA through its secondary
metabolites released in the surroundings. Moreover, the GC-MS analysis of
secondary metabolites showed the presence of compounds such as
9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)- and n-hexadecanoic acid, which are known for their antifungal
effects.
Author Contributions
IHK did experimental work and
wrote the paper. AJ supervised the work and contributed in writing and
finalizing the paper. DA provided GC-MS facility.
Conflict of Interest
There
is no conflict of interest among the authors and institutions where the work
has been done
Data Availability Declaration
All data
reported in this article are available with the corresponding authors and can
be produced on demand
References
Al-Marzoqi
AH, IH Hameed, SA Idan (2015). Analysis of bioactive
chemical components of two medicinal plants (Coriandrum sativum and Melia
azedarach) leaves using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Afr J Biotechnol 14:2812‒2830
Anjum R, M Afzal, R Baber,
MAJ Khan, W Kanwal, W Sajid, A Raheel (2019).
Endophytes: As potential biocontrol agent—review and future prospects. J
Agric Sci 11:113‒125
Arora S, S Meena (2017).
GC-MS profiling of Ceropegia bulbosa Roxb. var. bulbosa, an endangered plant from thar desert,
Rajasthan. Pharma Innov 6:568‒573
Arora S, G Kumar (2018).
Phytochemical screening of root, stem and leaves of Cenchrus biflorus Roxb. J Pharm Phytochem
7:1445‒1450
Banakar P, M Jayaraj (2017).
Pharmacognosy, phytochemistry and GC-MS analysis of ethanolic stem extract of Waltheria indica L.-A potent medicinal plant.
J Biol Prod Nat 7:369‒378
Bastakoti S, S Belbase, S Manandhar, C Arjyal (2017). Trichoderma
species as biocontrol agent against soil borne fungal pathogens. Nep J Biotechnol 5:39‒45
Bayoumy S, A Afify, A El-Sayed, S Elshal (2017).
Antagonistic effect of Bacillus spp. against sugar beet pathogens
fusarium wilt. J Agric Chem Biotechnol 8:177‒181
Calistru C, M McLean, P Berjak
(1997). In vitro studies on the potential
for biological control of Aspergillus
flavus and Fusarium moniliforme by Trichoderma
species. A study of the production of extracellular metabolites by Trichoderma species. Mycopathologia 137:115‒124
Chamorro M, TE Seijo, JC Noling, B De los
Santos, NA Peres (2016). Efficacy of fumigant treatments and inoculum placement
on control of Macrophomina phaseolina in strawberry beds. Crop Prot 90:163‒169
Chowdhury S, A Basu, TR Chaudhuri, S Kundu (2014). In-vitro
characterization of the behavior of Macrophomina
phaseolina (Tassi) Goid at the rhizosphere and during early infection of roots
of resistant and susceptible varieties of sesame. Eur J Plant Pathol 138:361‒375
Dashamiri S, M Ghaedi, A Salehi, R Jannesar (2018). Antibacterial, anti-fungal and E. coli
DNA cleavage of Euphorbia prostrata and Pelargonium
graveolens extract and their combination with novel nanoparticles. Braz J Pharm Sci 54; Article e177724
Degani O, S Dor, D Abraham, R Cohen
(2020). Interactions between Magnaporthiopsis
maydis and Macrophomina phaseolina, the causes of wilt diseases in maize and
cotton. Microorganisms 8; Article 249
Deng JJ, WQ Huang, ZW Li, DL
Lu, Y Zhang, XC Luo (2018). Biocontrol activity of recombinant aspartic
protease from Trichoderma harzianum against
pathogenic fungi. Enzyme Microb Technol 112:35‒42
Dong
ZY, N Rao, M Prabhu, M Xiao, HF Wang, WN Hozzein, WJ
Li (2017). Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against Staphylococcus
warneri synthesized using endophytic bacteria by
photo-irradiation. Front Microbiol 8; Article 1090
Doyle JJ, JL Doyle (1990).
Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:39‒40
Elaiyaraja A, G Chandramohan (2016).
Comparative phytochemical profile of Indoneesiella
echioides (L.) nees leaves using GC-MS. J
Pharm Phytochem 5:158‒171
Farnaz AA, A Narmani, M Arzanlou (2018). Macrophomina phaseolina associated with grapevine decline in Iran. Phytopathol Mediterr
57:107‒111
Gajera HP, DG Hirpara, DD Savaliya, BA Golakiya (2020).
Extracellular metabolomics of Trichoderma
biocontroller for antifungal action to restrain Rhizoctonia solani
Kuhn in cotton. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 112;
Article 101547
Gaur VK (2016). Study of the
isolation and antagonistic effect of microorganism viz., Trichoderma and
Bacillus spp. against different isolates of Macrophomina
phaseolina [Tassi] Goid. in vitro. Ann Agric Biol Res 21:144‒148
Hewavitharana N, SDP Kannangara, SP
Senanayake (2018). Isolation, identification and mass production of five Trichoderma
spp. on solid and liquid carrier media for commercialization. Intl J Appl
Sci Biotechnol 6:285‒293
Hoell IA, SS Klemsdal, G Vaaje-Kolstad, SJ Horn, VGH Eijsink
(2005). Overexpression and characterization of a novel chitinase from Trichoderma atroviride strain P1. Biochim Biophys Acta
1748:180‒190
Jadhav
MS, S Kulkarni, P Raikar, DA Barretto,
SK Vootla, US Raikar
(2018). Green biosynthesis of CuO & Ag–CuO nanoparticles from Malus domestica leaf extract
and evaluation of antibacterial, antioxidant and DNA cleavage activities. J
Chem 42:204‒213
Juliet YS, K Kalimuthu, C Vajjiram, V Ranjitha (2018). Evaluation and comparison of phytochemical,
GCMS and FTIR analysis of wild and micro propagated Cadaba
fruticosa (L.). World J Pharm Res 7:746‒760
Katrahalli U, BC Yallur, DH Manjunatha, PM Krishna (2019). BSA interaction and DNA
cleavage studies of anti-bacterial benzothiazol-2-yl-malonaldehyde. J Mol
Str 1196:96‒104
Khalili E, MA Javed, F Huyop, S Rayatpanah, S Jamshidi, RA Wahab
(2016). Evaluation of Trichoderma isolates as potential biological
control agent against soybean charcoal rot disease caused by Macrophomina phaseolina.
Biotechnol Biotechnol
Equip 30:479‒488
Khan AN, F Shair, K Malik, Z Hayat, MA Khan, FY Hafeez, MN Hassan
(2017). Molecular identification and genetic characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina
strains causing pathogenicity on sunflower and chickpea. Front Microbiol 8;
Article 1309
Kubicek CP, RL Mach, CK Peterbauer,
M Lorito (2001). Trichoderma:
From genes to biocontrol. J Plant Pathol 83:11‒23
Kumar G, A Maharshi, J
Patel, A Mukherjee, HB Singh, BK Sarma (2017). Trichoderma:
A potential fungal antagonist to control plant diseases. SATSA Mukhapatra Ann Tech
Issue 21:206‒218
Mukhopadhyay R, D Kumar
(2020). Trichoderma: A beneficial
antifungal agent and insights into its mechanism of biocontrol potential. Egypt J Biol Pest Cont
30; Article 133
Mishra PK, RK Dantre (2017). Evaluation of different biological agents
used as seed treatment to manage charcoal rot of soybean. Biosci
Trend 10:2784‒2788
Mokhtari W, N Chtaina, E Halmschlager, H Volgmayr, C Stauffer, W Jaklitsch
(2017). Potential antagonism of some Trichoderma strains isolated from
Moroccan soil against three phytopathogenic fungi of great economic importance.
Rev Maroc Sci Agron Vet 5:248‒254
Muchero W, JD Ehlers, TJ Close, PA Roberts (2011). Genic SNP
markers and legume synteny reveal candidate genes underlying QTL for Macrophomina phaseolina
resistance and maturity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp.]. BMC Genomics 12; Article 8
Muller-Scharer
H, S Bouchemousse, M Litto,
PB McEvoy, GK Roderick, Y Sun (2020). How to better predict long-term benefits
and risks in weed biocontrol: An evolutionary perspective. Curr
Opin Insect Sci 38:84‒91
Pandey S, G Satpathy, RK Gupta (2014). Evaluation of nutritional,
phytochemical, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of exotic fruit Limonia acidissima.
J Pharm Phytochem 3:81‒88
Pascale A, F Vinale, G Manganiello, M Nigro, S Lanzuise, M Ruocco, M Lorito
(2017). Trichoderma and its secondary metabolites improve yield and
quality of grapes. Crop Prot 92:176‒181
Pavithra KS, J Annadurai, R Ragunathan (2018). Phytochemical, antioxidant and a study
of bioactive compounds from Artemisia pallens.
J Pharm Phytochem 7:664‒675
Parizi TZ, M Ansari, T Elaminejad
(2012). Evaluation of the potential of Trichoderma
viride in the control of fungal pathogens of
Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) in vitro. Microb Pathol 52:201‒205
Piperkova N, M Zarkova, B Ahmed
(2016). Characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium spp. isolates from
sunflower. Agric Sci 8:95‒100
Pohl CH, JLF Kock, VS Thibane (2011). Antifungal free fatty acids: A review. In:
Science against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research and Technological
Advances, pp:61‒71. Méndez-Vilas A
(Ed.). Formatex Research Center, Norristown, Philadelphia,
USA
Pozo MJ, JM Baek, JM Garcia, CM Kenerley (2004). Functional analysis of tvsp1, a serine
protease-encoding gene in the biocontrol agent Trichoderma virens, Fungal
Genet Biol 41:336‒348
Prajapati R, LK Thakur, U
Singh (2017). Melia azedarach seed oil EC formulation and evaluation of its
antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia solani and
Sclerotium rolfsii pathogens. Adv Bioresour 8:141‒147
Premathilaka ULRR, GMSW Silva (2016). Bioactive compounds and
antioxidant activity of Bunchosia armeniaca. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 5:1237‒1247
Rini CR, KK Sulochana (2008).
Usefulness of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas against Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum
infecting tomato. J Trop Agric 45:21‒28
Sawant AM, R Vankudoth, V Navale, R Kumavat, P Kumari, B Santhakumari,
KR Vamkudoth (2019). Morphological and molecular
characterization of Penicillium rubens isolated from poultry feed. Ind Phytopathol 72:461‒478
Schroeder MM, Y Lai, M
Shirai, N Alsalek, T Tsuchiya, P Roberts, T Eulgem (2019). A novel Arabidopsis
pathosystem reveals cooperation of multiple hormonal
response-pathways in host resistance against the global crop destroyer Macrophomina phaseolina.
Sci Rep 9; Article 20083
Shareef HK, HJ Muhammed, HM
Hussein, IH Hameed (2016). Antibacterial effect of ginger (Zingiber
officinale) roscoe and bioactive chemical analysis using gas chromatography
mass spectrum. Orient J Chem 32:20‒40
Short GE, TD Wyllie, PR
Bristow (1980). Survival of Macrophomina phaseolina in soil and in residue of soybean. Phytopathology
70:13‒17
Soesanto L, E Mugiastuti, A Manan
(2019). Raw secondary metabolites application of two Trichoderma harzianum isolates towards vascular streak dieback on
cocoa seedlings. Pelita Perk 35:22‒32
Tahir NA, HA Azeez, HH Hama-Amin, JS Rashid, DA Omer (2019). Antibacterial activity and allelopathic effects of
extracts from leaf, stem and bark of Mt. Atlas mastic tree (Pistacia atlantica subsp kurdica) on crops and weeds. Allelopathy J 46:121‒32
Vasebi Y, N Safaie, A Alizadeh
(2013). Biological control of soybean charcoal root rot disease using bacterial
and fungal antagonists in vitro and greenhouse condition. J Crop Prot 2:139‒150
Vats S, T Gupta (2017).
Evaluation of bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential of hydroethanolic
extract of Moringa oleifera Lam. from Rajasthan, India. Physiol Mol Biol Plant 23:239‒248
Verma M, SK Brar, RD Tyagi,
RY Surampalli, JR Valero (2007). Antagonistic fungi, Trichoderma spp.: Panoply of biological
control. Biochem Eng J 37:1‒20
Verma VP, SH Kumar, KV Rani,
N Sehgal, O Prakash (2015). Compound profiling in methanol extract of Kalanchoe
blossfeldiana (flaming katy) leaves through GC-MS
analysis and evaluation of its bioactive properties. Glob J Adv Biol Sci
1:38‒49
Zhang S, B Xu, J Zhang, Y
Gan (2018). Identification of the antifungal activity of Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 and assessment of bioactive
substances in controlling phytopathogen. Pestic
Biochem Physiol 147:59‒66
Zhao L, Y Xu, X Lai (2018).
Antagonistic endophytic bacteria associated with nodules of soybean (Glycine
max L.) and plant growth-promoting properties. Braz
J Microbiol 49:269‒278
Zimudzi J, TA Coutinho, JE Van der Waals (2017).
Pathogenicity of fungi isolated from atypical skin blemishes on potatoes in
South Africa and Zimbabwe. Potato Res 60:119‒144